![judicial consent summary judicial consent summary](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/328578369_EL_PROCESO_DE_HOMOLOGACION_JUDICIAL_DE_LOS_ACUERDOS_DE_REFINANCIACION/links/5bd6eaaea6fdcc3a8dadd0e6/largepreview.png)
![judicial consent summary judicial consent summary](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/262377760_Measuring_Judicial_Ideal_Points_in_New_Democracies_The_Case_of_the_Philippines/links/55b3c63c08ae9289a08893f7/largepreview.png)
In addition, he figured out that such a government would fully serve the society with no special consideration to particular groups. He recommended that those representatives should be elected by a large number of people but not a small class. Order custom essay American Judicial System who was one of the United States Farmers had his own definition to the republic as a nation or country whose laws and policies are made and administered by some of representatives of the people. This is because it best exemplified republican government. Because England’s powers of government were balanced and divided among the king and the parliaments two houses (the commons and the House of Lords), this system was applicable. They chose a form of government called the republican government (Vaughan, 2003, p. The founders of constitution also believed that the common welfare meant having total protection to each individual’s natural rights of property, life and liberty. The middle class was favored as the most likely group to promote the common welfare because they had in mind that the rich and poor would mostly be concerned with promotion of their own interests. In the United State of America, the constitution founders believed that the only best form of government was one that would promote the welfare of an individual such as one social class or a director. The American judiciary system was found on the adversarial model.